![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum / Current Posts | Gallery | Active Topics | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Saturn Sky Redline Discussion Forum for discussion of aspects of the anticipated hi-performance version of the Saturn Sky. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
Why do we have a Throttle body?
Maybe i'm confused and this isnt the same throttle body that i'm used to, but why does the Sky redline have one? i thought the nature of Direct injection means no throttle body. We dont have a space where the air and fuel mix together before they are introduced into the cylinder. i see lots of people doing it. what does it do on this motor?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
ok then yeah it is different from what i'm thinking. like i said the throttle bodies i'm used to are what they use in atomizing the fuel in the air. in essence how they mix the air and fuel before it goes into the cylinder. but i guess how you are explaining on these cars they are just the air intake regulator (in a sense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The only difference between DI and a standard motor is instead of the fuel being injected into the intake manifold and combining with the air, it is injected (at an extremely high pressure) directly into the cylinder and combined with the air so as to promote a better burn. Many port their throttle bodies to allow greater airflow and a less restrictive "inlet" into the rest of the motor. By being less restrictive it should also technically lower the temperature of the air entering the engine vs. the stock throttle body due to its lower resistance against the air. This just goes along with most other mods that we currently have: allow the engine to breathe as best as possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
First 2000 Sr. Member
|
In theory, they could probably make the engine run without the throttle body, but I think it has emissions side-effects. Combustion chamber pressures and temperatures seem like a funny balancing act to me any more. There have been some interesting engines (read as powerful and/or efficient) that never saw production because of NOx, hydrocarbons, and such.
I remember reading (probably back in the 80's) about a little honda that got great gas mileage, and would actually lowered the ambient NOx in some cities, but it got booted for ... hydrocarbons (I think). |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
First 2000 Sr. Member
|
The only Direct Injection motors that do not need a throttle plate are diesels, but that's because they are designed to run extremely lean. The new ones have throttle bodies, but their sole purpose is to help optimize the mix of EGR and Fresh air for emissions purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.americansolutions.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
The short answer is that GM does not use technology like BMW's "Valvetronic" on either of the Sky's Ecotec engines (2.4 or 2.0 turbo) to eliminate the need for the throttle body.
Read this for details: BMW World - Technology Perhaps in the future, GM will deploy a similar technology across their engine line-up, but for now, you'll still see a traditional throttle body. And yes, as previously mentioned, the sole purpose of the throttle body is to regulate the flow of air into the intake manifold. The throttle body does not regulate fuel flow into the engine. Last edited by TBlueMax : 07-09-2008 at 01:52 AM. Reason: Addition of comment regarding purpose of throttle body... |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|