This is what comes with the stage kit per CED's website. My question is, does the code that the dealer needs to flash the tune on the instruction sheet? Or where does that come from?
This is what comes with the stage kit per CED's website. My question is, does the code that the dealer needs to flash the tune on the instruction sheet? Or where does that come from?
Yes, all the info they need is on the Instruction sheet... Good luck with the GMPP tune..
I didnt get any stickers, i may go have a chat with the thieving bastards at the dealership tomorrow
Years ago when I had my tune installed by my GM Dealer they forgot to put the labels on. I went back a few days later and made them find them which took them 2 weeks...
The install process includes hooking your EVM to the GM LAN and downloading the updated code. When the install is done, your vin is annotated in the GM database so your new baseline software is the GMPP version. If they do maintenance in the future, they need to install th GMPP software
__________________
2007 Sol GXP LS3 Hot Cam Punisher
2008 Sky RL 2.0 GMPP tune Green Dragon
RMSSC Secretary and chief bottle washer
The first page of the documentation has a place for an authorization code in which they place a sticker with an 8 digit code.
The directions are mostly how to connect the wiring, so if you get the kit with the harness adapter, they can skip right to page 5.
This page has calibration part numbers that correspond to the vehicle [Sky/Sol Auto or Manual trans]
This number, the authorization number from page 1 and the serial number on the box are all needed to get the tune. As such DONT FORGET THE BOX OR DIRECTIONS
when you go to the dealer
This is what comes with the stage kit per CED's website. My question is, does the code that the dealer needs to flash the tune on the instruction sheet? Or where does that come from?
Just curious, but why did you choose the GMPP over a more robust and modifiable tune like Trifecta?
Speaking for myself, it gives very good performance, keeps the factory warranty, and while allowing mods to give even more power, it's conservative enough to pretty much guarantee a long living motor.
Lots of people love other tunes and in fact I have the Ls2edit tune on my converted car. But I have basically one guy who maintains my tune and essentially no recourse if he can't or won't maintain the tune.
Also, in order to compete with the factory tune, after market tunes have to provide some advantage to compete with the factory tune. In my opinion, they give a bit more performance but also bring along more risks and increased stress on the motor which can affect longevity. I wanted to have a reliable car I can drive for years.
__________________
2007 Sol GXP LS3 Hot Cam Punisher
2008 Sky RL 2.0 GMPP tune Green Dragon
RMSSC Secretary and chief bottle washer
The gmpp tune is as changeable as the trifecta or as any other tune.
Its just a little safer on the levels because GM would not to warranty something that pushes the engine the limit.
But
That does not mean you cant change it after the fact.
It just ends up costing more if you do that
But
With a high flow cat the gmpp tune will deliver almost 300 hp to the rear wheels which is pretty much what all tunes end up with shy of swapping the turbo
My reasons pretty much mirror those of Rob's. I had a cobalt ss years ago and my grand plan was to make it the fast LSJ out there. I did it all, every bolt on, upgraded supercharger, meth injection, custom hptuners tune, the works. And it was fast but with all that work came problems and reliability issues. For this redline I just want a little bit more kick in the pants and to not have the nagging issues I had with the heavy modded cobalt.
With a high flow cat the gmpp tune will deliver almost 300 hp to the rear wheels
Don't think so - that would be 300 or a tad more at the flywheel. If it were 300 rwp you'd be headed toward 350 bhp. If that is what you meant, then maybe you can post some dynos that support it - I just haven't seen anything like that with just the GMPP and a high flow CAT.
__________________
1958 MGA Twincam (race car)
1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster,
1957 Jamaican bodied MGA
1965 Jensen CV8,
1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
Bill in BC
Someone already posted the dyno to prove it. I'll let you do the search.
It's not that hard to believe.
a High Flow cat can add up to 20-30 hp depending on the tune.
The GMPP is dyno proven at 263-265hp at the rear wheels. I personally posted one of those Dyno Charts and had 4 other people dyno the same day on the same dyno and achieve results all within 2 hp.
So add 20-30hp at the rear wheels for the high flow cat and you have
285-295 hp at the rear wheels depending on the vehicle
285-295 is almost 300.
It's been proven. Just a matter of how much you want to argue the definition of the word almost
Someone already posted the dyno to prove it. I'll let you do the search.
It's not that hard to believe.
a High Flow cat can add up to 20-30 hp depending on the tune.
The GMPP is dyno proven at 263-265hp at the rear wheels. I personally posted one of those Dyno Charts and had 4 other people dyno the same day on the same dyno and achieve results all within 2 hp.
So add 20-30hp at the rear wheels for the high flow cat and you have
285-295 hp at the rear wheels depending on the vehicle
285-295 is almost 300.
It's been proven. Just a matter of how much you want to argue the definition of the word almost
Yeah - but!
The GMPP tune is 290 at the flywheel on the GM dyno which translates to around 250 or a bit less whp, regardless of what other various makes of dyno might read (notoriously high or low and really only useful for gauging relative changes in tune on a given car).
As for 30 hp bump from the Solo CAT, even they only claim 15 bhp, which equates to about 13 whp, so that would result in about 263whp , or 309 BHP - and those are the numbers I have seen mentioned - around 310 BHP or so.
I've never seen anyone claiming 300 whp=350 BHP with that combination, although I'm sure you could find a dyno somewhere that might read that.
__________________
1958 MGA Twincam (race car)
1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster,
1957 Jamaican bodied MGA
1965 Jensen CV8,
1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
Bill in BC
Definition of ALMOST
: very nearly but not exactly or entirely
No one claimed 300.
We showed results for
Very nearly but not exactly 300 Wheel hp
People don't have access to the GM Dyno, so they use the ones that local companies have.
That's normally a Dynojet, Dynocom or Mustang.
The results when using the same Dyno allow for as consistent a comparison as possible, but it's never Exact.
The results that many have posted mimic what I have stated and the posts show that.
Here is one post on this forum with the difference between stock and GMPP Kenny's GMPP Turbo Upgrade Dyno Results
This was one of the cars that participated in the following event Jersey Roadster Dyno Day – 11/22/08
Funny thing is the Non GMPP tuned car had the worst results this day.
Almost 300 whp or 300 whp, you are still claiming that the GMPP tune with 290 BHP suddenly shoots to 340-350 BHP (equivalent to your 'just below 300 whp) with the addition of a single mod that the vendors only claim 15 BHP boost from. Am I reading you wrong?
It looks like you claim in whp what the factory and the after market vendor claim in BHP - usually a 15-18% difference.
We may just be arguing about high reading dynos, I don't know. Thanks for the referenced threads, although one appears to be nothing but an abortive attempt to arrange a dyno session.
I think you and I are on the same page about what effect various mods have, we are just quibbling over dyno readings. I don't know how GM measures their engines, perhaps they are intentionally conservative, although in my experience if they had a dyno that could kick out a reading of 300 or better, the marketing weasels would have been all over it.
__________________
1958 MGA Twincam (race car)
1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster,
1957 Jamaican bodied MGA
1965 Jensen CV8,
1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
Bill in BC
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.