![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum / Current Posts | Gallery | Active Topics | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Technical Saturn Sky Discussion Technical and performance aspects of the Saturn Sky Roadster. Sky Problems | Solutions | Repairs | Recalls | Tech Bulletins | Tech Tips | In the Manual Basic Tech |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
First 2000 Sr. Member
|
easy mod that might help [list of potential Kappa mods]
hey all, many of us car nuts know that when a factory delivers us (the mass') a new car or any car for that matter, they more often then not leave a lot to be desired in the sake of keeping tree hugging hippies happy. what i mean by that is that rather then putting quality filters in the car they put very restrictive filters in its place to cut costs or sometimes to make the gas mileage better. one factor people have not taken into consideration is the spark plugs. most auto makers when they figure out the proper spark plug, gap the plug for a reasonable amount of power but also fuel economy. i have yet to try the solstice or the sky but my guess would be that like many other rides, if you put a better filter in teh car your performance will improve. also, if the gap of teh spark plug is changed (to a certain extent mind you) it may be possible to gain a few extra HP because the closer gap provides a hotter spark. im not saying its a guarentee, but rest assured when i get my sky, the first place im going is to the dyno with a filter, and then an extra set of spark plugs gapped lower to see the improvement or loss of power from the sparks. just thought id share a fairly cheap mod with you. we will ahve to wait and see if this works for the sky and the sol. (it worked on my VW so i dont see it not working anyway)
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
|
Nice summary SkyCaptain!
I am anxious to see just what some of these mods will mean to power since this version of the ecotec is already a HO version from the factory. We'll see just how HO it is, and how much more power can be extracted through many of these changes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
|
Bringing Sky's text over to share here.
Quote:
__________________
2006 Solstice, Mysterious [sold] - Born Sept 8th, 2005 2007 Solstice GXP, Mean - Born Nov 17th, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
|
Another good post.
Quote:
__________________
2006 Solstice, Mysterious [sold] - Born Sept 8th, 2005 2007 Solstice GXP, Mean - Born Nov 17th, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
First 2000 Sr. Member
|
Exhaust mods I've found to be practically useless and costly, now and in the future. They reduce fuel economy and kill low end torque and the improvements in quarter mile times have consistently been shown in Automag testings to be negligible, when testing is properly done. Same goes for
chip reprogrammings. I remember one magazine that spent almost a week tuning and testing the chip mods and ended up shaving less than 2/10 secs from the quarter mile ( < 1/10 sec on 0-60 runs). Save your money and a lot of headaches. Everytime I see these exhaust mod kits and "Super chips" I automatically think "Scam." Does anyone really believe that GM would forsake increasing the power of the Solstice by avoiding simple increases in the exhaust system and intake capacity? The costs to GM would be negligible - the cost of piping is practically zilch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
|
Unfortunately I can't really agree with your comment about this. My ZX2 S/R was a normal ZX2 that came stock with a intake, cat-back exhaust, and chip upgrade over the normal ZX2 designed by Ford. It gave my car a 10% power gain (~13HP) over the base car. It also gave my car a 0.4s difference in 1/4 mile times. The car just feels far more lively and revs much better compared to a base car. Also, just because you don't get faster times doesn't mean your car isn't running better in some manor. I might not be able to get a faster 0-60 but with the S/R mods on my car the engine responds much faster then a base car making it far more responsive on an autocross style course.
Header/exhaust upgrades also help get larger % gains from other future mods, especially some sort of forced induction. A normal system on a NA car might only net a few extra HP, but usually once a FI system is introduced you help aleviate even more restrictions that are now being created by the new even more poweful system. Also the reason big car makers don't do the types of things the aftermarket does is because their cars have to be 50 state legal, and have a much stricter set of limitations they have to adhere too. If you make a product 49 state (screw CA) legal then theres an extremely large list of things you can increase and alter on an engine thats limited to meet CA requirments.
__________________
2006 Solstice, Mysterious [sold] - Born Sept 8th, 2005 2007 Solstice GXP, Mean - Born Nov 17th, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
First 2000
|
Don't forget the most important mod ever, the "driver mod." Nothing like time spent on a track in high performance driver's ed will help you get more out of your car. It's money seriously well spent. It's not that expensive either. I live in Topeka, KS where Heartland Park Track is home of the SCCA. On Second Wed night of every month the track is open, for $35 you get to drive it with an instructor if you're a rookie or solo if not. I get about 20 or so laps in on average (w/ instructor.) Many tracks have similar programs, on average you pay around 2-250 for a weekend's worth of track time.
Also, look into SCCA and attend local autocross events. The worse that can happen is that you mow down some cones, no better way to learn car control.
__________________
Babak '05 Elise, Chrome Orange '99 Ducati 996 Bip, Pasta Sauce Red '05 Freelander SE |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
|
Exactly what Babak said.
If you can't learn to drive good in a base Kappa, the only thing adding more power is going to do is partially hide your inability to drive the car well.
__________________
2006 Solstice, Mysterious [sold] - Born Sept 8th, 2005 2007 Solstice GXP, Mean - Born Nov 17th, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
First 2000 Sr. Member
|
Per skycaptain's list
__________________
The Sky's the limit! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
First 2000
|
Quote:
Be safe and shiney side up.
__________________
Babak '05 Elise, Chrome Orange '99 Ducati 996 Bip, Pasta Sauce Red '05 Freelander SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
First 2000 Sr. Member
|
Let me put it this way, why would Pontiac "detune" the Solstice ecotec,when they are trying to make every HP they possibly can to compete with Miata and others, at a cost of increasing exhaust system pipes (zero cost) or of different chip programming (also zero cost)? That simply makes no sense whatsoever. So now you'll going to do what GM , for some inconceivable reason, to their detriment, refused to do. I'll bet anyone that if you put a high capacity exhaust and new reprogrammed chip (actually not reprogrammed, soimply one with different parameters) you will succeed only in reducing your bank account and making a lot of noise. You will also lose low end torque. Remember, simply changing the temperature by 40 degrees
gains or loses you around 10-15% power. So 1/4 mile times of .4 seconds difference don't necessairily prove anything. "Cold air" induction has been used several times by Pontiac in the past, and has had minimal impact on HP. Try finding some "cold air" to feed you engine when it's 100 degrees outside and the asphalt makes it seem like 120. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | ||||
|
First 2000 Sr. Member
|
Quote:
You've posted this opinion in a half dozen different threads. You are wrong. There are literally hundreds of thousands of enthusiasts, vendors, racing groups, etc. that have proven this time and time again. You are what we call a "bench racer", armed with nothing but ill informed opinions. Quote:
Btw, the loss of low end torque is a myth once you examine the whole curve. Increased exhast flow shifts torque higher in the power band. Area under the curve is always increased. That's why many people who race their cars remove their exhaust at the track, and invariably run better times. Quote:
Quote:
It is obvious that you have no clue what you are talking about. Take a seat, sit back, stay tuned, and learn a little something from those who actually know. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | ||
|
First 2000 Sr. Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
First 2000
|
maybe im not understanding what your trying to say or disprove, but i have a ford lightning ,which is a supercharged f150, and by adding a chip and a lower pulley i added over 85rwhp which is mostly from the "chip" because i have a hand held tuner in which i use to change the parameters of the motor i want to change and buy pulling or adding timing changing fuel curves and other things i can drop and add30-40hp in minutes. so please dont give ill informed info to people looking to improve their car.
Josh |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
First 2000 Sr. Member
|
"It makes perfect sense when you consider that fresh tooling, experienced assemblers, day of the week, etc. produce DOCUMENTED differences in stock engines. That's why you can take 2 identical cars at the same dyno and get different numbers. Some engines just come off the assembly line better than the others. Because of this, OEM pcms are programmed to provide advertised h |