Whats the best octane for a Sky? - Page 5 - Saturn Sky Forums: Saturn Sky Forum
General Saturn Sky Discussion Forum for discussing general topics on the Saturn SKY.

User Tag List

 18Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #61 of 73 (permalink) Old 09-28-2017, 06:12 PM
Super Moderator
 
Robotech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 10,616
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1672 Post(s)
Garage
Again, knock it off. Final warning.

I don't care who you think started it, or continued it, or finished it...just move on.

Forums repeat topics and have old topics resurrected. It is the nature of them. Most of the resurrections here have been okay. When it prompts new discussions even about old topics there is nothing wrong with that. I mean, what's a discussion forum if there is no discussion? However, I do want you folks to keep this civil and this back and forth banter is getting close to crossing lines.

Again, take a break for a couple days and then come back if you're getting that emotional about things. This goes for everyone. I had to retype this three times to make sure my emotions are out of it.


V.A.L. (#1108)
2007 2.4 Base
MagnaFlow dual outlet, quad tip exhaust test car
**Sold**

Max (#1547)
2007 TURBO 2.4
Too much to list here. See my Garage for details.
Robotech is offline  
post #62 of 73 (permalink) Old 09-30-2017, 01:15 PM
Moderator
 
JohnWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 4,644
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
A 2009 article at fuel-testers.com states that a "newer" vehicle in good condition will lose 2-3% economy on E10, while an older vehicle can lose up to 20%.

John
Lexington, KY
Sky NA 2007 Midnight Blue
Sky RL 2008 Carbon Flash - Naked
JohnWR is offline  
post #63 of 73 (permalink) Old 09-30-2017, 02:33 PM
Super Moderator
 
Robotech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 10,616
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1672 Post(s)
Garage
Interesting. I wonder what about the older vehicle causes the larger difference? Do they cover that in the article John?


V.A.L. (#1108)
2007 2.4 Base
MagnaFlow dual outlet, quad tip exhaust test car
**Sold**

Max (#1547)
2007 TURBO 2.4
Too much to list here. See my Garage for details.
Robotech is offline  
post #64 of 73 (permalink) Old 09-30-2017, 02:49 PM
Senior Member
 
TomatoSoup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 3,812
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 476 Post(s)
I would guess that an older vehicle doesn't have a powerfull ECM that can do a closed loop analysis of the burn rate and oxygen sensor readings. Even older vehicles don't have 02 sensors at all (i.e old fuel inj. systems and carbs).

Owner of "Campbelle", a Brazen 2008 GXP ... with mods piling up...
TomatoSoup is offline  
post #65 of 73 (permalink) Old 09-30-2017, 06:59 PM
Moderator
 
JohnWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 4,644
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
No indication was given in the article, but I suspect that TS is correct. Closed-loop engine control is a very powerful thing.

John
Lexington, KY
Sky NA 2007 Midnight Blue
Sky RL 2008 Carbon Flash - Naked
JohnWR is offline  
post #66 of 73 (permalink) Old 09-30-2017, 11:20 PM
Super Moderator
 
Robotech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 10,616
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1672 Post(s)
Garage
Well, and there comes the rub as to what is an "older car"? 20 years ago cats still had O2s and closed loops systems yet I'd still consider a 20 year old car "older".


V.A.L. (#1108)
2007 2.4 Base
MagnaFlow dual outlet, quad tip exhaust test car
**Sold**

Max (#1547)
2007 TURBO 2.4
Too much to list here. See my Garage for details.
Robotech is offline  
post #67 of 73 (permalink) Old 10-01-2017, 02:22 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mainz, Germany
Posts: 877
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Yikes. Just came in here to see what was going on...

mstrjon32 is offline  
post #68 of 73 (permalink) Old 10-01-2017, 02:09 PM
Senior Member
 
wspohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,192
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 329 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomatoSoup View Post
I would guess that an older vehicle doesn't have a powerfull ECM that can do a closed loop analysis of the burn rate and oxygen sensor readings. Even older vehicles don't have 02 sensors at all (i.e old fuel inj. systems and carbs).
Quote:
In the 1980s, GMís first powertrain control module had four kilobytes of memory and executed 1 million operations per second. Today, General Motorsí electronic control modules perform more than 125 million operations per second with unmatched reliability. The Regalís modern engine controller is tested under extreme conditions for longevity and functionality.
Buick Regal Engine Brainpower is Industry?s Quickest

Things have come a long way. Your cell phone has computing capabilities that far exceeded NASA's when they were setting up the moon shots.

Quote:
Put simply, the iPhone 6ís clock is 32,600 times faster than the best Apollo era computers and could perform instructions 120,000,000 times faster.
Smartphone is millions of times faster than NASA's 1960s computers

1957 Jamaican MGA
1958 MGA Twincam
1962 MGA Coupe
1971 Jensen Interceptor
2007 BMW Z4M coupe
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
departed
1965 Jensen CV8
1969 MGC roadster,
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT

Bill in BC
wspohn is offline  
post #69 of 73 (permalink) Old 09-02-2018, 10:57 PM
Member
 
Emmett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robotech View Post
Again, knock it off. Final warning.

I don't care who you think started it, or continued it, or finished it...just move on.

Forums repeat topics and have old topics resurrected. It is the nature of them. Most of the resurrections here have been okay. When it prompts new discussions even about old topics there is nothing wrong with that. I mean, what's a discussion forum if there is no discussion? However, I do want you folks to keep this civil and this back and forth banter is getting close to crossing lines.

Again, take a break for a couple days and then come back if you're getting that emotional about things. This goes for everyone. I had to retype this three times to make sure my emotions are out of it.
Search for me on the skyroadster form isn't working. I get okay results searching on google and adding skyroadster.com in the search string.

But if search in skyroadster worked better I'd search before posting.
Emmett is offline  
post #70 of 73 (permalink) Old 09-02-2018, 11:05 PM
Member
 
Emmett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robotech View Post
Interesting. I wonder what about the older vehicle causes the larger difference? Do they cover that in the article John?
While we're on the subject of degraded performance and older vehicles...

This is a very good video: "GM Reduced Engine Power Mystery Solved"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5BEPmFB6cw&t=100s

According to this - over the course of a few years - the wiring in the throttle body melds together.

I get only 18 MPG highway on my Sky - and I'm planning on replacing the throttle-body by the end of the year.

I think of it as a $275 gamble.

If I win afterwards I hope get more like 22 or 24 MPG.

em
Emmett is offline  
post #71 of 73 (permalink) Old 09-03-2018, 12:29 PM
Member
 
lunaticfringe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 126
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmett View Post
While we're on the subject of degraded performance and older vehicles...

This is a very good video: "GM Reduced Engine Power Mystery Solved"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5BEPmFB6cw&t=100s

According to this - over the course of a few years - the wiring in the throttle body melds together.

I get only 18 MPG highway on my Sky - and I'm planning on replacing the throttle-body by the end of the year.

I think of it as a $275 gamble.

If I win afterwards I hope get more like 22 or 24 MPG.

em

Cant you just fix the wiring?

Never mind! Just watched the video. it was very interesting.

2007 base Sky
Purchased 5/12/18 with 37K-not a scratch
Live in N. NV

Last edited by lunaticfringe; 09-04-2018 at 07:06 PM.
lunaticfringe is offline  
post #72 of 73 (permalink) Old 08-06-2019, 07:10 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
This is/was an interesting thread. I always thought the base 2.4 required premium - I have no idea how but I totally missed the past where it says it is designed to run on 87 octane with slightly degraded performance.

As for octone my understanding has always been the ECM is designed for a particular octone, and if you go over that you get no benefit, but if you go under it, you can get knocking and noticeable performance decreases. I had a 400hp '05 GTO and an older '98 Corvette, both required 91 octane, and if you went under that you'd get knocking. On the Corvette you'd get pretty bad knocking, very noticeable - and it would go away quickly once you got some 93 back into the tank and it mixed around. My gf at the time took the Vette out and put some cheap gas in it, and it ran like garbage, and that's when I figured out octone CAN (sometimes) make a difference.

I'll have to put some cheap stuff in my '07 Sky and see how it runs. The price difference between 87 and 93 used to only be about $.10-.15 back in the Vette days, so it wasn't a big deal - but now it's routinely a $.60 difference even though gas prices have only doubled.

Anyways - I was wondering about this, googled it, and this was the first result. Thanks for bringing it up and talking about it.
Uppity is offline  
post #73 of 73 (permalink) Old 08-06-2019, 07:17 PM
Moderator
 
JohnWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 4,644
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uppity View Post
This is/was an interesting thread. I always thought the base 2.4 required premium - I have no idea how but I totally missed the past where it says it is designed to run on 87 octane with slightly degraded performance........
This may be true somewhere, under some conditions, but I did some quite extensive testing and found that, here at least, using 87 octane doesn't degrade anything.
Rusty Boltz likes this.

John
Lexington, KY
Sky NA 2007 Midnight Blue
Sky RL 2008 Carbon Flash - Naked
JohnWR is offline  
Reply

  Saturn Sky Forums: Saturn Sky Forum > Saturn Sky Discussion > General Saturn Sky Discussion

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Saturn Sky Forums: Saturn Sky Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome