Saturn Sky Forum banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,602 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Interesting review. Favorable, but??
Too favorable? What do folks think.
Or is just left handed as the car's from Saturn.
I thought it seemed too negative on the Solstice for reasons which felt a bit off.
I just can't quite pin down why the article feels off key.
Maybe too used to harsher reviews.?

Any thoughts about this one?

http://www.latimes.com/classified/a...,0,1635293.story?coll=la-class-autos-highway1
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,677 Posts
cerberus said:
Interesting review. Favorable, but??
Too favorable? What do folks think.
Or is just left handed as the car's from Saturn.
I thought it seemed too negative on the Solstice for reasons which felt a bit off.
I just can't quite pin down why the article feels off key.
Maybe too used to harsher reviews.?

Any thoughts about this one?

http://www.latimes.com/classified/a...,0,1635293.story?coll=la-class-autos-highway1
As usual - they don't seem to get technical details right.

The suspension has the same anti-roll bars for both cars... but at least they recognized that the SKY they drove is prolly much better than the early car they drove as an example of the Solstices. I drove a very late (near 18,000 VIN) Solstice recently, and it is much more solid now than the early press car I drove last year - so the plant is definitely getting better at building them.

I don't know that it's so DRASTICALLY different, though, as this article would lead you to believe.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
342 Posts
As a member on another forum put it:
Dear god,
Please stop the apocalypse. We like it here on earth!!

-What else should I take from a positive Dan Neil review of a GM car in the LATimes. The apocalypse has to be around the corner. This guy wrote the review (which I agree mostly with) about the G6; absolutely trashing the car starting that whole row between the LATimes and GM.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
421 Posts
I've been following Saturn since I had it as a case study during grad school back in '83. I think the reviewer got the historical perspective and what the Sky (and Aura etc., models) mean to Saturn and GM respectively, right on.

As for the review of the Sky, I would agree there too. The Sky is not without it's flaws but it more than succeeds where it's important (looks, handling, ride and overall value for your dollar).

I can't wait to see what improvements are made on the '08 models and how those reviews will rate future models.

Really now, if the reviews were any better could you imagine the wait for Sky's being any longer? Uggh!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
248 Posts
LA Times Sky Article

RUMBLE SEAT/DAN NEIL
With the Sky, GM has polished up its vision for a darty little two-seat convertible. In a Saturn, no less.

DAN NEIL
Los Angeles Times
August 2, 2006

THE Saturn Sky — the celestially seasoned version of the Pontiac Solstice roadster — reminds us that there is no idea so good that GM won't toss it in a burlap sack and beat it with reeds. Such a notion was the Saturn Corp. Set up in the pastoral Podunk of Spring Hill, Tenn., in the late 1980s, Saturn was supposed to be anodyne to all things wrong with Detroit. At a time when GM's other divisions shared more DNA than the Habsburgs, Saturn was a fresh-slate approach to car-building, with its own cars, reflecting its own engineering and design philosophy. It had its own customer-focused, no-haggle retail environment, inviting you to join the "Saturn family," with all the podpeople overtones the phrases implies.

Saturn was all that, for about five minutes. Then the company began its slow spiral into GM's corporate gravity well. No vehicle better exemplifies Saturn's rescinded autonomy than the Relay minivan, a re-badged version of the Chevy Uplander/Pontiac SV6/Buick Terraza. That's so GM orthodox it's practically Hasidic.

But now, with the release of the Saturn Sky, GM is unveiling a new orbital path for the Ringed Planet. Forget independence and second-channel thinking. Henceforth, the Saturn brand will stand for a better class of product redundancy.

Compared to its clonal sibling the Pontiac Solstice, the Saturn Sky is more likable in every direction. The Sky's exterior styling, with the Corvette-like saber scars on its cheeks, the beveled, refractory chrome accents all around and other visual wickedness, has a honed and hardened raciness the slightly edemic Solstice doesn't. It's no coincidence that the Sky's styling is reminiscent of the old Opel Speedster, since the Sky — styled in GM's Coventry, England, studio — will be sold overseas as the Opel GT.

Likewise, the Sky's interior looks and feels more polished and sophisticated, with gloss-black surfacing on the central console ("piano" black, if you make your pianos from molded plastic resin) and e-brake lever, and brushed alloy trim on the shift console and door handles. The upgrading extends to the standard equipment list, with the Sky offering air-conditioning, projector head lamps, anti-lock brakes, cruise control, power accessories, keyless entry and lots of other cost-extra items on the Solstice's order list. The Sky costs about three grand more than the base Solstice and weighs 73 pounds more. Both penny and pound penalties seem worth it.

Most perplexing — especially if you're a Pontiac dealer — is that the Sky drives better. This might have to do with the extra months of experience gained by the staff at the Wilmington, Del., factory, where Solstice and Sky are assembled. The Sky feels more of a piece than the early production Solstice I drove, which had a modest hood shake and various titters and squeaks. The Sky — also built on the rear-drive Kappa platform, with an architecture of hydroformed steel frame rails, à la Corvette — feels by degrees stiffer in the backbone and slightly more limber at the wheels. The Sky's Bilstein coil-overs have a touch more compliance dialed into them. With longer suspension travel and less rigid anti-roll bars, the Sky serves up a more comfortable, less concussive ride and stays planted on rough pavement that would make the Solstice skip like a phonograph needle.

Solstice and Sky are powered by the same 2.4-liter twin-cam four engine routing max power of 177 hp through a nick-nick, five-speed gearbox (an automatic is optional). The Sky can light the rear tires up in first gear, but it isn't really a hard-punching sports car. Zero-to-60 mph acceleration is about 7.5 seconds. The car is at its best on mountain snares and carousels, where you can keep the engine roiling at around 4,000 rpm, wrist-shifting between second and third gears. The engine's thrusty character and the syrupy burbles in the exhaust note remind me of a good British roadster. My MGA, for instance.

For a little corporate cupcake, the Sky is capable of some significant hard driving. The steering is sharp, taut and full of subtle feedbacks from the asphalt. The cornering grip — thanks mainly to the big Goodyears on the corners — is reliable and easy to access. With its slightly nose-heavy weight distribution, the Sky can be coaxed into nice, progressive tail-sliding behavior that can be nulled out with a dab of throttle and counter steer.

Once on the highway, shift the car into fifth gear and the Sky drops an octave. The Sky-walker is a comfortable cruiser, with well bolstered seats, a decent sound system and adequate protection from buffeting at speeds up to about 80 mph. The steering has good self-centering behavior at high speed but the Sky never loses that alert, slightly darty feel of a roadster. Meanwhile, few cars at any price cut such a compellingly shaped hole in the wind.

Of course, there are small irritations. For a car named Sky, the sky is actually quite hard to access. The top requires several awkward steps to open and close, and one step where you have to jump on the rear hatch like a crazy person to make sure it's closed.

Quibbling aside, the Saturn Sky is an immensely likable car with a cool factor measured in parsecs. After Corvette, this is my favorite car from the General, and I would recommend it to anyone.

So it might seem a rude question: Why is this car a Saturn? Why does this brand need a hot roadster that actually out-Solstices the Pontiac? Even more impertinent: Why will Saturn get the Sky Red Line, a version of the Pontiac Solstice GXP, the turbocharged, 260-hp piece of road ordnance? And while I'm asking, I'd be interested in hearing the corporate strategy behind the Saturn Aura. This is a handsome variant of the Pontiac G6, only equipped with bigger engines, a trick new six-speed manumatic transmission (optional), and higher levels of trim. Cannibalism, anyone?

In very short order, Saturn has gone from the redheaded hillbilly stepchild of GM's brand lineup to something of a favored son. GM will even be bringing swank, Euro-style Opels to the States and putting the little red badges on them. If this keeps up, Saturn will be GM's most interesting and innovative brand, and its coolest. It will have traveled across the universe to wind up in the place it started.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedi...ck=1&cset=true
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
994 Posts
Another positive review. Thanks
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top